From Tools to Mindset: What Two Days of Design Thinking Taught Us

Written by: Md Shanaullah Shihab & Pratiksha Ghimire

Design Thinking | Reflection | Learning

The contact sessions on 4–5 September gave us an opportunity to look at Design Thinking (DT) not simply as a collection of tools, but as a different way of understanding and approaching challenges. The discussions, learning activities, and reflections helped us recognize that effective innovation begins with understanding people, their needs, and the context of a problem before moving towards solutions.

During the two contact days of the Design Thinking course, we learned new ways of learning and engaged in group discussions. We also discovered that the first few ideas are often similar and not very creative, so we need to push ourselves to look at things differently and combine two different approaches for new ideas. These two days were very interesting, and learning felt easy and fresh rather than boring, thanks to the variety of tasks, group work, and examples. In the classroom, students are divided into different groups, and we started by sharing personal thoughts and experiences, which revealed that many students struggled to adjust to the Laurea system. This phase helps us to find the real problem of the student and empathize with them. We started brainstorming diverse ideas that were generated by each member of the group, and collaborating on them provided a prototype solution to create an app called NEST. We also realized that design and innovation are driven by people’s needs and problems.

Learning from the Articles

The article by Cankurtaran and Beverland (2020), Using Design Thinking to Respond to Crises: B2B Lessons from the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic, particularly highlighted the importance of DT when dealing with uncertainty. The authors describe crises as “wicked problems” because they are complex, interconnected, and constantly changing. Their three-stage process—disrupt, define and develop, and transform—shows how organizations can question existing assumptions, understand problems in context, develop possible solutions, and continuously learn through experimentation.

One important lesson for us was the value of not rushing to a solution. Contextual understanding, questioning, and iteration can lead to better responses, especially when circumstances are uncertain.

The second article, Augsten and Marzavan (2017), Achieving Sustainable Innovation for Organisations through the Practice of Design Thinking, takes the discussion further. Their case study of the German automotive industry argues that design thinking should not be treated merely as a set of methods, workshops or templates. Instead, it can become a “strategic art” that supports organizational transformation and sustainable innovation. This requires collaboration across functions, openness to different perspectives and organizational support for experimentation.

The Book: Change by Design

Tim Brown’s Change by Design provided another valuable perspective. Brown presents Design Thinking as a human-centered approach to innovation that connects people’s needs with technological possibilities and business objectives. The relationship between desirability, feasibility and viability helped us understand why successful innovation needs to balance the human experience with practical and organizational realities.

Together, the book and articles show that Design Thinking is more than a process. It is a mindset built around empathy, curiosity, collaboration, experimentation, visualization and learning from uncertainty.

What we Take Forward

As a Supply Chain Management professional, I can see strong opportunities to apply this mindset to customs experience, process improvement, supply chain resilience, and service innovation “Md Shanaullah Shihab“. Instead of asking only, “How can we improve the existing process?”, Design Thinking encourages us to ask, “What do our users really need, and how might we create a better experience?”

Our biggest takeaway from these two days is simple: do not rush to the answer. Understand the problem, involve people, experiment, learn, and redesign. Design thinking is more than just a method; it’s a mindset focused on putting people first. By truly understanding user needs and solving problems creatively, we have learned that the best solutions come from empathy, simple models, and a willingness to adapt through feedback. This mindset can help transform complex challenges into meaningful opportunities for innovation.

References:

Augsten, A., & Marzavan, D. (2017). Achieving sustainable innovation for organisations through the practice of Design Thinking: A case study in the German automotive industry. https://canvas.laurea.fi/courses/15059/files/3954660?wrap=1

Cankurtaran, P., & Beverland, M. B. (2020). Using design thinking to respond to crises: B2B lessons from the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. https://canvas.laurea.fi/courses/15059/files/3954664?wrap=1

Brown, T. (2009/2019). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. https://laurea.finna.fi/Record/3amk.254850/Details?sid=5528690527&imgid=1

Figures

All images were created from original photographs taken during the course and subsequently edited using ChatGPT.


Posted

in

by

Comments

4 responses to “From Tools to Mindset: What Two Days of Design Thinking Taught Us”

  1. kie00013 Avatar
    kie00013

    I really liked your point about not rushing to a solution. That has also been one of my biggest takeaways from learning about Design Thinking. It can be tempting to start thinking about solutions as soon as we see a problem, especially when we already have experience in the area. This is something I have noticed that I do.

    It also raises an interesting challenge. The more familiar we are with a service or process, the easier it can be to assume that we already understand the problem. This makes empathy and questioning our assumptions especially important.

    Your discussion about bringing different perspectives together also made me wonder whether this is an aspect of Design Thinking that can sometimes be overlooked. Collaboration is not only about generating more ideas, but also about challenging our own way of seeing and understanding the problem.

  2. olukayodeadebiyi7ee6e04ba8 Avatar
    olukayodeadebiyi7ee6e04ba8

    Hi Shihab and Pratiksha,

    Thank you for sharing your reflection. Your post captured the shift from simply using Design Thinking tools to actually thinking differently about problems. Since we were part of the same team, it was especially meaningful for me to read your perspective on the process we experienced together.

    What I found most valuable was seeing the whole journey in practice: moving through the challenge phase of Discover and Define, where we explored the real needs and challenges of new international master’s students, and then into the outcome phase of Develop and Deliver, where our ideas gradually took shape into a prototype.

    Experiencing those stages together made the theory much easier to understand because we could actually see how empathy, reframing, collaboration and experimentation connected in practice.

    Your point about not rushing to a solution also stayed with me. Which part of the process do you think challenged our team’s original assumptions the most?

  3. andreiapaisdacunhateixeira Avatar
    andreiapaisdacunhateixeira

    I like that you bring the following lesson to the surface: not rushing to a solution. It’s so easy to go towards a solution, instead of focusing on the problem layers. It shouldn’t be, be we are programmed to do it. It’s good that our group was confronted with Design Thinking in the beginning of your journey at Laurea. I agree with you on putting people first. I think it’s the purpose on any problem we face and I’m glad we all dived pretty well in it. We were are specially open to feedback. Let’s stick to this mindset!

  4. Sayef Uddin Rifat Avatar
    Sayef Uddin Rifat

    Thank you for this! This really helped to connect the stages of “disrupt, define and develop, and transform” that Beverland and Cankurtaran have talked about with the NEST prototype that your group developed. The “don’t rush to the solution” principle struck home to me in a very tangible way – being in the business of producing TV content for the last 15 years, in any brief, my first reaction is to immediately come up with a format or a shot list, as this is what “speed” means in this context. Now I can see that this is totally contrary to the idea of empathy research, which requires understanding the problem first.

Leave a Reply