From Shared Experiences to an App: Our Design Thinking Journey

By Michael Sylvia and Laxmi Khatri Shrestha

It began with storytelling and listening
(Empathy)

Photo by Laxmi Khatri Shrestha

In our first group exercise, Katja Tschimmel showed us how universal questions created common ground among diverse people from all over the world. We learned about each other and where we started on our paths that led to Espoo. Each question told a little story about who we were starting a Design Thinking journey that would lead to developing an app for international students in Finland.

From shared stories to a shared problem
(Collaboration)

Photo by Michael Sylvia

From our stories, we identified different challenges. Through ideation exercises and a lot of Post-It notes moving around the wall, patterns emerged: unfamiliar academic expectations, information scattered across systems, culture shock, time management, and finding the right sources. We saw the uncertainty and complexity of the problems we were faced and identified the wicked problem we shared – adjusting to academic life in Finland.

How might we? (Experimentation)

Photos by Laxmi Khatri Shrestha, edited with ChatGPT

We all struggled with myriad sources of information and talked about existing resources, like the New Student Guide pages on Laurea’s website. We found that it met Kolko’s (2015) description of a technically efficient service that was frustrating and stressful. We had moved from findings to insights by collecting data, jointly documenting our findings while staying aware of our biases, and creating problems statements (Marzavan, 2022, 46).

Through this process, Auki began to take shape.

Who are we designing for? (Visualization)

Generated by ChatGPT

Focusing on emotional experiences was important to us because users do not judge a service only by whether it technically works. They also judge whether it feels clear, safe, respectful, and easy to use. Creating personas let us take a step back from our personal experiences (and biases) and look at the problem externally to imagine a single, friendly source, weaving together the threads of our wicked problems through human-centered design.

From Post-Its to Auki (Prototyping)

Generated by ChatGPT

Post-Its were an imperfect medium for envisioning an app, so we turned to Claude AI to generate possible solutions. We discussed and iterated our prompts to present test cases to other teams for feedback. All our readings have stressed the importance of prototyping and failing fast, yet there were reservations about how this would work in real life. Our stories contained examples where a lack of leadership buy-in to the process affected not only outcomes, but team morale and careers.

Bringing it all together (Holistic Approach)

Screenshot of Laurea’s SID blog.

Auki wasn’t the most important outcome – it was gaining knowledge of how Design Thinking works by actually doing it. Like Marshall McLuhan’s famous quote “The mediums is the message,” the path to solving a wicked problem is a destination of itself, as Buchanan emphasized, because it was complex, involved different perspectives, and could not be solved through one simple solution.

In the end, we shard our stories (human centered approach), put our challenges on the wall (collaboration), brainstormed solutions (experimentation), created and tested a prototype (visualization), presented our solution to the class and instructors, and wrote this post about our experience (holistic conclusion) (Tschimmel et al, p. 29).


Sources

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), pp.5–21. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kolko, J. (2015) Design thinking comes of age. The approach, once used primarily in product design, is now infusing corporate culture. Harvard Business Review September 2015, 66-71.

Mootee, Idris. (2013) Design Thinking for Strategic Innovation : What They Can’t Teach You at Business or Design School, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

Marzavan, D. 2022. Findings ≠ Insights. In K. Tschimmel (ed.), Creativity and Innovation Affairs: Are They or Are They Not? Porto: Mindshake, 46-47.

Tschimmel K. (2022). Creativity, Design and Design Thinking—A Human-Centred ménage à trois for Innovation. In: Raposo D., Neves J., Silva J. (eds.). Perspectives on Design II. Springer Series in Design and Innovation, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79879-6_1

Tschimmel, K. 2026. Design thinking masterclass at SID. [lecture]. Held on 4–5 September. Laurea University of Applied Sciences.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

3 responses to “From Shared Experiences to an App: Our Design Thinking Journey”

  1. syedasadhussain7c5daea1cb Avatar
    syedasadhussain7c5daea1cb

    Hi Michael and Laxmi,

    The New Student Guide point made me smile, because I’ve actually worked on services like that. Years ago, I worked on mobile money onboarding. On paper, every step was there, but people still dropped off halfway. What helped in the end was having a local agent nearby who could answer their questions when they got stuck.

    It made me wonder if Auki could also benefit from something similar. Maybe a senior student or peer tutor who can answer the questions that the app doesn’t anticipate.

    I also liked that you used Claude to prototype. Our group had a working app too, but we still ended up pitching a paper map because it kept us focused on the problem rather than the technology.

    Would you do it the same way again?

    1. Mike Sylvia Avatar
      Mike Sylvia

      Hey Asad –

      I really like the idea of having a person on the other end of the app. Our intention with it was to foster a community of new and old students helping each other and to connect in real life, instead of just over a screen.

      I would have like to have taken the Claude prototyping further and to develop actual working screens, instead of just a mock-up of what they would look like. I think getting a sense of the apps daily functions would have shown us some of the issues you ran into with your onboarding app. Then the re-iterations would begin, questioning our original assumptions.

      Would I do it the same way again? I would most certainly do the whole process again because we not only built an app, we built a team.

      Best,
      Mike

  2. annamarisandlund Avatar
    annamarisandlund

    Hi Michael and Laxmi,

    I was wondering how easy or difficult it was for your team to agree on what to focus on and why. What helped you move forward and find a shared direction?

    I really liked how you turned a complex challenge into something tangible in just one day. Auki was not just an idea, but already a visual prototype you could show, test and develop further. It also made me reflect on our own process, where we did not get quite as far in turning our idea into something concrete. This kind of visual prototype also makes an idea easier to understand, and even sell, as you can actually see and experience it.

    I’m also curious about the role of AI in your process. How did it help you structure Auki and turn your ideas into something concrete? Did it challenge your thinking or mainly speed up the prototyping?

    For me, this connects well with testing assumptions, learning quickly and even failing early before investing too much in a solution.

    Thanks for sharing your journey!
    Annamari

Leave a Reply