Three bees collecting honey.

Beyond the Lone Genius: The Power of Hive Intelligence

Reflections by Nayoma Hiruni Peiris and Juha Takanen

…. Moving “Beyond the Lone Genius,” Design Thinking transforms ambiguity into opportunity by applying “hive intelligence” to tackle the emotional core of human needs and navigate the complexity of “wicked problems” ……. 

The Emotional Core of Design: Head, Heart, and Gut 

The experience with design thinking started with mixed feelings: a healthy dose of doubt on day one, but also curiosity and relief. Our initial comprehension of the program was very limited, but through Professor Katja Tschimmel’s guidance, the outlook soon changed. We came to understand that design thinking is so much more than just a surface-level framework; it is a human-cantered methodology grounded in empathy and collaboration. The initial sessions, an icebreaker and “Deep Interviews,” were my first forays into learning how to approach real-world, complex problems using design. Katja’s workshop felt like an invitation to be just the way we were, busy bees, as we later realized, and not to pretend otherwise – just to be ourselves and be active. Our individual uniqueness and professions are crucial elements in the Design Thinking process, as it’s best when it is multifunctional (Lockwood 2010, 51), including and integrating many parts of any business. 

Recognizing our mixed feelings was important, as emotions are at the core of design, both on the designer and customer side. A designer must have empathy (Brown 2008, 87), the ability to step into the customer’s shoes to truly understand what people want and gain new insights to innovate new products and services that resonate. For the customer to really commit to any brand or product, the emotional component must be there; otherwise, the relationship is short-lived. Designing holistically, or activating emotional intelligence by connecting the head, the heart, and the gut, as Clark and Smith (Lockwood 2010, 49) propose, allows us to design innovations that resonate with both the customer’s emotion and logic. 

The essence of the collaborative process….  

Bridging Theory and Practice: Tackling Wicked Problems 

Day two, we bridged theory and practice with a hands-on innovation exercise. This experience confirmed that service is a different discipline that needs to be addressed with new languages and instruments. Service design applies features like co-creation, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and relentless reframing (Lockwood 2010, 160). In the workshop, we transitioned from brainstorming our ideas to reframing challenges as “How Might We” questions, and then to a quick prototyping session. 

The article, “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking,” revealed that design is more than a simple craft. We found out that design is a “new liberal art of technological culture” (Buchanan 1992, 5), a discipline for addressing problems that are ill-defined and resistant to analysis. These “wicked problems” cannot be solved with a simple “yes or no,” but rather through solutions that are “good or bad” in context (Buchanan 1992, 16). This approach highlights the value of ambiguity and complexity. 

The Power of Hive Intelligence 

The biggest takeaway for us from the workshop was the fundamental shift in the innovation process: the move away from the myth of the “lone genius.” We noted how design thinking moves away from the traditional business model, which can feel trapped in the “cold mechanics of the assembly line” and relies on a single “creative genius” (Lockwood 2010, 40). Design thinking invites a co-creative process that feels like an act of “hive intelligence,” where everyone’s unique ideas build on others (Lockwood 2010, 51). 

“Hive intelligence,” showing many individuals contributing to a larger 

What began for us with doubt and curiosity has ended with a fundamental shift in perspective.   

References:  

Brown, Tim (2008) Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, June, 84-95.     

Buchanan, R., 1992. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), pp.5-21.  

Lockwood, Thomas (ed. by) (2010) Design thinking: integrating innovation, customer experience and brand value.  New York: Allworth Press. 


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

7 responses to “Beyond the Lone Genius: The Power of Hive Intelligence”

  1. Jutismita.Hazarika Avatar
    Jutismita.Hazarika

    Wow, your blog post raises a lot of amazing points. This gives me a very different perspective on collective creativity. I like how you have drawn attention to the idea that “ lone genius” is a myth, and embracing co-creativity is the way. Using the notion of ‘hive intelligence’ is an incredibly smart way to present your thoughts on dealing with ambiguity and “wicked problems.”

    I like the idea of holistic design thinking. In my experience, connecting the head, heart, and gut can lead to deeper insights. This brings me to a question. How to deal with time constraints while deep diving into the emotional aspect? Starting with “How Might We” questions and prototyping quickly can be a solution for projects with tight deadlines. However, it is natural to get stuck in initial frames. What strategies would ensure that continuous iteration happens throughout the process?

    Additionally, I would like to touch upon another dimension. In “hive intelligence,” diversity matters the most, but it also brings challenges and conflicts, unlike in a beehive. How do we foster an environment where diversity doesn’t become a roadblock but a productive force?

    1. nayomasamarakkodiarachchige Avatar
      nayomasamarakkodiarachchige

      Thank you, Jutismita, for your incredibly insightful comment! We’re delighted you connected with the idea of “hive intelligence.” Your questions about dealing with time and managing diversity are key to making Design Thinking truly practical.

      To balance time constraints with emotional depth, the strategy is to be smart, not slow. We quickly get to the core emotional truth using focused methods like the 5 Whys, then immediately test that insight with rapid, disposable prototypes. This not only gives us instant user feedback but also forces continuous iteration by removing the psychological barrier to change. As for fostering productive diversity, the solution lies in clear rules: we strictly separate the idea generation phase from the selection phase, making sure to defer judgment initially. Crucially, a good facilitator manages conflicts by translating personal disagreements into design constraints, ensuring every unique perspective becomes a creative force rather than a roadblock.

      Thanks again for such a great contribution to the discussion!

  2. valmkinen Avatar

    Hi Nayoma & Juha!

    We have the similar insight about the teams and the myth of the “lone genius”, even though we do not call it directly like this in our blog post with Mallika, “All of us are smarter than any of us: The power of Design Thinking”. Nevertheless, we also discuss the importance of having the right teams. Without collaboration, the design thinking and innovation are impossible. From my personal experience, for any productive teamwork, we need participants from different backgrounds, visions, and thinking. Why is this important? If we have in one room only people with an “entrepreneurship” mindset, they probably will be perfect for ideation, but are likely to lack the ability to take action. Thus, I absolutely agree with your point, and we also recognise this in our practice during the class with Katja.

    One aspect that made me think is the discussion of empathy. Throughout all the texts that we have read on Design Thinking, it has been underlined that empathy is the key for design thinkers. I also believe that we need empathy, as everything the service designers do involves people. Therefore, I wonder how we can find a balance between empathy and effectiveness. How can one deeply engage with human emotions in dynamic projects without missing deadlines? I will take it as my homework to search, explore and find possible answers to this question.

    Finally, I would also like to highlight a few words about the structure and the message flow. I enjoyed reading it. Thank you for the smooth message and valuable insights!

    1. nayomasamarakkodiarachchige Avatar
      nayomasamarakkodiarachchige

      Thanks so much for reading and for sharing your insights! It’s great to hear that you and Mallika reached a similar conclusion about the “myth of the lone genius” in your post, “All of us are smarter than any of us.” We completely agree that diversity of thought, not just having an entrepreneurial mindset, but also including people who can execute and apply different lenses is what makes “hive intelligence” truly powerful and essential for innovation.

      That balance between empathy and effectiveness you highlight is one of the most fundamental challenges in Design Thinking. It’s exactly the question we wrestled with, too! As you’re taking it as homework, a great place to start exploring is the idea of “focused empathy.” Instead of spending a long time trying to understand everything, the goal is to conduct short, intense interactions (like using the 5 Whys) to quickly pinpoint the most powerful emotional truth or pain point. By making our prototypes low-fidelity and disposable, we turn them into rapid empathy checks—a very effective and fast way to confirm our emotional understanding without sacrificing project deadlines. We look forward to reading your findings!

      Thanks again for the kind words about the flow of our blog post!

  3. lin00021 Avatar
    lin00021

    Your blog had a very attention-grabbing headline and hero image! After reading it, I was thinking how good of a name that “hive intelligence” would be for a design or insight agency. And after googling a bit, I found out that someone has already used it as a company name 😁

    I liked how you described the shift of perspective and how your own thoughts changed from doubt to curiosity during and after the design thinking sessions we had. It would be nice to know, it this change of perspective (from lone genius to co-creative way of working) will change the way you work in the future?

    I found this hive intelligence very intriguing and it made me curious in researching it a bit more from its’ biological perspective but also its’ analogy to working life.

    A good blog gives you some new information or viewpoints and yours served that purpose extremely well. It was a joy to read!

  4. Satu Wilson Avatar
    Satu Wilson

    Thank you for your inspiring reflection on our journey to the depths of design thinking. I say ours as it feels like you have described the feelings of many, if not most of us in the SID group.

    I really like how you connect the emotions with design thinking, especially the idea of engaging head, heart and gut in the creative process. It is a great reminder that empathy is not just a tool, but the essence of meaningful design.

    I just love the term ‘hive intelligence’. It made me think how collaboration can lead to deeper innovation, not only combining ideas but by creating a sense of shared purpose. I wonder how teams can keep this hive mindset alive once the initial excitement of a workshop fades? Maybe the real challenge lies in turning that energy into lasting culture of co-creation.

  5. heidieaho Avatar
    heidieaho

    Thank you for sharing your insight of the course and the learnings. I can truly relate to the shift in perspective from the days, I had it too. For a long time, I have believed in the lone genius myth, where one person has built something by themselves. I never though of it in the way of building on others’ ideas or conversations. It gives such a refreshing perspective that I have began to use at work, where I view working in a team completely differently now.

    I enjoy how you talk about ‘’Our individual uniqueness and professions are crucial elements in Design Thinking process…’’, this is something that is extremely comforting and encouraging. In Design Thinking, as we learned in the class, there is no right or wrong answers – simply ideas that are built on. It makes the field equal in a sense for all participants, no matter what the background, previous knowledge or experience is. The equal setting is further helped with the ‘’How might we…’’ questions, instead of simply accepting or declining ideas.

    These are learnings, I will carry into my future, where I will always strive to make an environment where all participants feels heard and having the space to be themselves. I will also try to remind myself of being brave to say my ideas, even if I feel nervous or shy. Afterall, without all the unique intakes and perspectives, the project would be all the less insightful.

Leave a reply to heidieaho Cancel reply