Let us unlock new tools with Design Thinking

Reflections by Tuukka Savinainen & Showmen Rudra

The themes of the days became noticeably clear during the teaching, and the understanding of why something grew during the teaching also increased. We went through the entire design thinking process in service design and experienced the power of activating thinking through various exercises.  

Design Thinking is a creative and human-centered approach that emphasizes empathy and innovation. It involves various exercises aimed at discovering new ideas and gathering feedback. Key principles include the idea of “Yes, and” instead of “Yes, but” which fosters a positive atmosphere in business and culture. This method combines practical innovation with a touch of artistry.  

Reminder of The six steps of Desing thinking were available two days at class room

The first day brought a lot of theoretical knowledge, which was utilized through practical exercises as part of the learning. The day was topped off with a challenge where we had to, as part of the process, go through an interview as part of designing the perfect wallet for a client. The most memorable lesson of the day was the technique of empathy. Practicing empathy does not mean sympathizing with the answers, but rather careful listening where guidance was provided through additional questions. Practicing this side will surely bring relief and even hilarious situations to everyday life if this ability was misused. Imagine now, for example, a salesperson just listening and wriggling when he cannot complete and guide all the other person’s answers himself. Understand, observe, point of view, ideate, prototype, was the marching order in studying the topics. 

The framework is designed to help designers incorporate empathy into their work. It is based on psychological principles and offers a structure for empathic design. This framework can guide the use of existing empathy techniques, help develop new tools and encourage further discussion about the role of empathy in design. We hope this framework sparks more conversation and development of empathy-driven design methods. (Kouprie & Visser 2009.) 

The second day brought with it some amazing challenges, referred to as Wicked Problems. Our group, like the others, consisted of four people. In practice the first task within the group was to divide the tasks according to the pre-assigned titles. The role allocation in this section is such that everyone has an equally strong responsibility for guiding the process as a whole and a responsibility to participate equally. Collaboration is essential, as group work thrives in this environment. Together, we embark on a journey to explore the transformative potential of Design Thinking in addressing social challenges and enriching customer culture. 

Great productivity from the group and process was going forward

Design Thinking is a natural part of how we all think and explore the world. It complements our existing skills and knowledge by focusing on the forms, relationships, behaviors, and human interactions that drive our world. It is important to remember that Design Thinking is not the opposite of data-driven thinking. It is its own way of analyzing information, one that emphasizes human experience and emotions. (Mootee 2013, 39.) 

Desing thinking expained (Mootee 2015, 33).

Through diverse understandings we as a group managed to push through a PESTEL analysis, create a trend map, and begin stakeholder mapping. From there the group headed into the field to conduct research in interviews. As a summary of the interviews, we gained important data indicating that the most crucial aspect of our customers’ problem was not what we had anticipated. Different customer types altogether were coming to our minds. However, it can be concluded that fieldwork and data collection through interviews are extremely valuable. The deeper one can delve into collecting data from various perspectives, the more significantly the understanding improves during the problem-solving phase. 

In a design-focused company, employees like to understand what people want and must by noticing their behavior. Since it’s hard to explain these insights with numbers, they use emotional words (such desires and experiences) to describe products and how they make users feel. While a traditional value proposition tells what is going to get from a product, an emotional value proposition promises how it will make us feel. Therefore, companies, emotional language is valued and considered key to good user experience, as well as its leads to business success. (Kolko 2015.) 

The lessons learned over these two days were immense, but as part of the design thinking process, it is crucial to understand the importance of not jumping to solutions too early and to trust the process and its unfolding. Creative, innovative thinking and generating ideas with the help of tools is a treasure that should be cherished and practiced individually, in pairs, and as a group. Courage and generating ideas, even if they do not always lead to concrete progress, enriches the next idea. Be bold, dare to be yourself and bring that to the forefront, because there are undoubtedly great ideas within all of us. 

References 

Kouprie, M. & Visser, F. S. 2009. A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user’s life. Journal of engineering design, 437-448. Accessed 28 September 2024. https://web-p-ebscohost-com.nelli.laurea.fi/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=e1b04fb3-73a7-4e74-8f80-33af4e5bdcdb%40redis  

Kolko, J. 2015. Design thinking comes of age: The approach, once used primarily in product design, is now infusing corporate culture. Harvard Business Review, September, 66-71. Accessed 15 September 2024. https://hbr.org/2015/09/design-thinking-comes-of-age    

Mootee, I. 2013. Design Thinking for Strategic Innovation: What They Can’t Teach You at Business or Design School. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. 


Posted

in

by

Comments

2 responses to “Let us unlock new tools with Design Thinking”

  1. rosayang02e92df4f7 Avatar
    rosayang02e92df4f7

    Thank you Tuukka and Showmen for you blog post! It outlined the different topics we went through in the Design Thinking course nicely. What sucked with me from the course was also the “Yes And” exercise. We tend to limit the possibilities before we even give them a chance to evolve. This exercise showcased clearly how our own minds can be the first barriers for creative thinking.

    In addition, your reflections on empathy provided good touchpoints how to approach the technique from different angles. Empathy not being the same as sympathy is a good reminder, especially when working in sales, to listen carefully and not to guide the conversation to the direction of your own presumption. From own experience, this is a common pitfall in sales. The arguments to support your case starts driving the conversation and the insights that you could have gained from the customer are completely ignored, leading to disappointing customer experience.

    I agree with you that empathy should be in the core of design methods, since it can bring the human-centered approach to pretty much everything. It is especially important in data-driven scenarios, which are typically not associated with a human-centered approach. As you wrote, design thinking is not the opposite of data-driven thinking, both can and should co-exists to create more creative ways to problem solving.

  2. stinne Avatar

    Hi Showmen and Tuukka,

    Thank you so much for a really insightful blog. I’m impressed with how eloquent and at the same time concise you managed to summarise the extensive content of our two-day course on design thinking while adding some really wonderful personal reflections.

    What stuck with me is how you phrase the essence of the “yes and” method as “combining practical innovation with a touch of artistry.” I’m really struck by the language you use to describe this methodology and I also believe you have articulated something very essential about design thinking itself. The combination of being very proficient in the tools, methods, approaches, and techniques of design thinking while at the same time combining that with the humanness, the empathy, the intuition, and the presence that utilising these tools really requires. I think that’s an important take-away and it reminds us of the complexities of using these methods. There is somehow a tension between the planning and skillset of the methods and at the same time the openness and ability to be present in a situation and notice these moments that you can’t plan for.

    I also really liked how you end the blog and emphasises this idea of the process over the outcome. You remind us that every time we utilise design thinking and put this method into practice, we might not always get to the result we want or thought, but we will always emerge wiser and it will provide insights for future projects and activities. I think the idea that “nothing is lost” and that there is always something to take away is a really important part. We cannot measure the impact or output of a process as a linear, start-middle-end approach. It is circular and continuous and each process feeds into the next, even if we don’t see it right away. That’s a great reminder!

    Thanks for these wonderful insights and for sparking new ideas in my mind!

Leave a comment